Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Psychology & Developing Societies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Indigenous Social Psychology of Science for a Developing Society: An Empirical Justification

Neelam Kumar

National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi

The study begins with the question of whether there should be an indigenous social psychology of science for the developing world. In search of an answer, this study par ticularly explores whether the scientific values of Indian scientists are context bound or universal in nature. Using a psychometric approach, this study explores the nature of scientific values held by Indian scientists. To explore the structure of scientists' values, factor analysis was used. Results reveal replication of a few dimensions conceptualised in previous research in other cultural contexts and point towards the universal nature of research-related values. The results also show the similarities in terms of the nature in which scientific values relate to various research behaviours of scientists. The study further reveals that research-related values of scientists did not vary either with the biographical or the work context (that is, academic and national laboratory). Actually these varied with the various research activities. This provides additional validity of the universal nature of scientists' value system. Thus as far as the epistemological aspects of science are concerned, the need for a separate psychology related to science in develop ing countries does not seem desirable.

Psychology & Developing Societies, Vol. 13, No. 2, 153-171 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/097133360101300203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?