Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Psychology & Developing Societies
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruback, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Ingroup Bias, Intergroup Contact and the Attribution of Blame for Riots

R. Barry Ruback

Barry R. Ruback is with the Pennsylvania State University, USA. His research interests include causes and correlates of victimisation, victims’ coping strategies and victims’ decisions to call the police and to remain involved in the criminal justice system. He is also interested, more generally, in decision making in the criminal justice system and environmental issues. e-mail bruback{at}psu.edu

Purnima Singh

Purnima Singh is with the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Delhi. Her research interests include justice, intergroup relations, identity and conflict.

Hindu and Muslim college students judged the severity of a riot and attributed blame for that riot to the Hindu community, the Muslim community and the individual offenders. Both Hindu and Muslim students showed an ingroup bias, in that when offenders were from participants’ own religious group, they blamed the offenders the most and their own community the least. However, when the offenders were from the other religious group, students (both Hindus and Muslims) blamed the other religious community. Two results were consistent with the research literature on equal status intergroup contact. First, the amount of contact Hindu students had with Muslims was negatively related to their assignment of blame to offenders. Second, Hindu participants who lived in mixed Hindu–Muslim neighbourhoods were less likely to blame the Muslim community.

References

  • Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B.E. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice . International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2 (2), 113–133 .[CrossRef]
  • Ansari, M.J. (1981). Fraternalistic relative deprivation and styles of conflict resolution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Allahabad, Allahabad.
  • Brewer, M.B., & Miller, N. (1996). Intergroup relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
  • Brophy, I.N. (1946). The luxury of anti-Negro prejudice . Public Opinion Quarterly, 9, 456–466 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Campbell, D.T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of status of aggregates of persons as social entitites . Behavioral Science, 3 (1), 14–25 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world's scale validity . Social Justice Research, 12 (2), 79–98 .[CrossRef]
  • Doosje, B., & Branscombe, N.R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group . European Journal of Social Psychology, 33 (2), 235–248 .[CrossRef]
  • Duncan, B.L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (4), 590–598 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ghosh, E.S.K., Kumar, R., & Tripathi, R.C. (1992). The communal cauldron: Relations between Hindus and Muslims in India and their reactions to norm violations. In R.C. Tripathi & R. DeRidder (Eds), Norm violation and intergroup relations (pp. 70–89). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press .
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley .
  • Hewstone, M. (1990). The "ultimate attribution error"? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution . European Journal of Social Psychology, 20 (4), 311–335 .
  • Hunter, J.A., Stringer, M., & Watson, R.P. (1991). Intergroup violence and intergroup attributions . British Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (3), 261–266 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Islam, M.R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 (6), 700–710 .[Abstract]
  • Kumar, R. (1999). Intergroup relations among Hindus, Muslims, and Christians: Some perceptions . Paper presented at the convention of NAOP. University of Lucknow, Lucknow.
  • Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D.L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2), 194–204 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Manshardt, C. (1936). The Hindu-Muslim problem in India. London, England: George Allen & Unwin .
  • Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration . European Journal of Social Psychology, 22 (2), 103–122 .[CrossRef]
  • Naqvi, N. (1980). Relative deprivation and attribution of blame in communal riots. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Allahabad, Allahabad.
  • Pettigrew, T.F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5 (4), 461–476 .[Abstract]
  • Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2005). Allport's intergroup contact hypothesis: Its history and influence. In J.F. Dovidio, P. Glick & L.A. Rudman (Eds), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 262–277). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing .
  • Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (5), 751–783 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Saxena, N.C. (1984). The nature and origin of communal riots in India. In A.A. Engineer (Ed.), Communal riots in post-independence India (pp. 51–67). Hyderabad: Sangam Books .
  • Stouffer, S.A., Schuman, E.A., Devinney, L.C., Star, S.A., & Williams, R.M., JR. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
  • Taylor, D.M., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5 (2), 162–171 .[Abstract]
  • Tripathi, R.C., & Srivastava, R. (1981). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes . European Journal of Social Psychology, 11 (3), 313–318 .[CrossRef]
  • Tropp, L.R., & Pettigrew, T.F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups . Psychological Science, 16 (12), 951–957 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press .
  • Wilkinson, S.I. (1998). The electoral incentives for ethnic violence: Hindu–Muslim riots in India. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
  • Williams, R.M., JR. (1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions. New York: Social Science Research Council .
  • Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(Monograph, Suppl. 2), 1–27 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Psychology & Developing Societies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 249-265 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/097133360701900206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruback, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Singh, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?